Don't Cancel Flood Insurance due to Mitigation | James Howard Don’t Cancel Flood Insurance due to Mitigation | James Howard

Eur Ing Dr James P. Howard, II
A Mathematician, a Different Kind of Mathematician, and a Statistician

image representing a theme in this article

Don't Cancel Flood Insurance due to Mitigation

The owner of an auto repair shop, whose shop sits on the Mill Creek floodplain in Delaware, has been flooded 32 times since 1989. Following completion of a flood abatement project by the Army Corps of Engineers, which will not eliminate, but lessen flooding, the owner cancelled his flood insurance policy. Here’s a video of the story:

While we can question of the wisdom of staying after being flooded out 32 times in 26 years, dropping flood insurance is almost certainly a bad idea. And one we could see coming. People are less likely to purchase flood insurance if they believe the property is protected by a flood mitigation system, regardless of actual risk. That’s a real problem for people who are still on the floodplain and may not realize it. In addition to risk of mitigation failing, as it did in New Orleans, following Katrina, the purpose of flood mitigation is to mitigate damages, not eliminate them.

The worst part of this is properties with flood mitigation protection are likely to pay substantially less than similarly situated properties without mitigation due to the reduced effects.

Image by FEMA via Wikimedia.