Dimensionality Reduction Through SVD | James Howard Dimensionality Reduction Through SVD | James Howard

James Howard A Mathematician, a Different Kind of Mathematician, and a Statistician

image representing a theme in this article

Dimensionality Reduction Through SVD

Singular value decomposition (SVD) is something I found challenging when I took linear algebra as an undergraduate, decades ago. It’s complicated. It’s hard to calculate. And there’s no reason for it, as introduced at the undergraduate level.

It was not until some years later that I realized it had an interesting application in my work: dimensionality reduction. Doing a lot of machine learning, this is relevant to my interests. To a point. When doing machine learning, we like to push harder and harder on adding more and more data to the analysis. Can we find something that influences our predictions to give us just another point of accuracy. There’s a downside to this, and that is the models, as they get wider, get harder to compute.

SVD spreads the values of the matrix all across the matrix, so eliminating some columns still gives some of the data coming through. This allows for dimensionality reduction. Think of it like applying a projection from [latex]n[/latex] dimensions to [latex]n-k[/latex], except the mathematics is different. It makes for faster computations without much loss of information.

All of this comes with the downside of losing explainability. Coming from a social science background, I like to make sure my models make sense. That is, if people have more money, they spend more money. That makes sense. If carbon in the atmosphere goes up, the temperature goes up. That, again, makes sense. Causal theory is a thing.

But most of the dimensionality reductions run the data through a meat grinder. We cannot figure out what contributes to the solution. That kills explainability and makes these models difficult to justify in practice.